Lawyers for the family of Malcolm X have unveiled new witness testimony that they are saying corroborates their declare that US authorities have been concerned in his assassination.
Mustafa Hassan, 84, a former affiliate of the Black civil rights chief, stated in a sworn affidavit that he was current at his chief’s homicide in 1965 and believes cops tried to assist the gunman escape the scene.
Mr Hassan alleged that one officer requested one other whether or not the gunman was “with us” – that’s, whether or not he was a police informant. Mr Hassan additional alleged that he was by no means interviewed by authorities.
Ben Crump, a distinguished civil rights lawyer who plans to sue the New York Police Division (NYPD) and different authorities businesses on behalf of Malcolm X’s family, argued that this was proof the officers knew one in every of their moles may make a transfer towards Malcolm X’s life.
“When the police first run as much as the one that has simply shot Malcolm X, are they making an attempt to cease him? No,” stated Mr Crump at a press convention on Tuesday.
“What they’re saying is, ‘Is he with us?’ As a result of they do not know if their particular person was assigned to shoot Malcolm or not.”
Malcolm X was a pivotal determine within the battle for Black civil rights and the nascent Black Energy motion, whose assassination on the Audubon Ballroom in New York Metropolis despatched shockwaves internationally.
Three members of the Nation of Islam, which was bitterly feuding with him on the time, have been jailed for his homicide. However in 2021, the New York Supreme Courtroom posthumously overturned two of these males’s convictions after investigators discovered that the prosecution had withheld proof.
Mr Crump is now representing Malcolm X’s family in a deliberate lawsuit towards the NYPD, the FBI, the CIA and extra, which he accuses of taking part in a job within the homicide.
“What we’re saying is, this conspiracy goes as much as the highest,” Mr Crump stated, describing Mr Hassan’s proof as “explosive and astonishing”.
Citing statements by former NYPD informants, he argued that there have been many authorities brokers within the crowd that day who have been stored compartmentalised from one another – which means particular person NYPD officers wouldn’t have recognized all of their identities.
As proof that Mr Hassan was certainly current, Mr Crump confirmed photographs and video from the scene that he stated featured a youthful Mr Hassan.
One picture appeared to point out Mr Hassan grappling with an NYPD officer as police tried to protect Thomas Hagan – the person convicted of Malcolm X’s homicide, and the one one who really confessed – from an indignant crowd.
Mr Hassan stated there was “little doubt in [his] thoughts” that Mr Hagan was engaged on behalf of the NYPD or one other US authorities company.
The Impartial has requested the NYPD for remark. The FBI and CIA have beforehand declined to touch upon the lawsuit.