MPs write to The Sun over Huw Edwards coverage and Dan Wootton investigation

The chairwoman of a committee of MPs has written to The Sun over its coverage of allegations in opposition to BBC presenter Huw Edwards and requested particulars of the newspaper’s investigation into its former journalist Dan Wootton.

Tradition, Media and Sport Committee chairwoman Dame Caroline Dinenage has additionally written to the BBC to ask for additional details about the critiques the company is finishing up into its processes following the claims that veteran broadcaster Edwards paid an adolescent for sexually express photographs.

Earlier this month, The Sun was the primary to report the allegations in opposition to the then-unnamed presenter, who was later recognized as Edwards by his spouse.

Dame Caroline’s letter to The Sun editor Victoria Newton requested her to clarify what had been carried out to confirm the story.

It stated: “Our position just isn’t to problem particular person tales or editorial choices, however we might be grateful when you might set out the processes by which The Sun verifies any story it chooses to report, particularly these the place problems with privateness could also be at stake.”

It added: “Given the considerations which have been reported about inaccuracies, altering narratives and lack of engagement with a number of the events concerned within the case of Mr Edwards, we might additionally have an interest to perceive what was carried out to confirm this particular story and what, if any, critiques or discussions are ongoing about The Sun’s procedures and reporting on this case and any wider classes to be realized.”

Newton’s response described The Sun as a “accountable media organisation” which has “strict editorial and authorized frameworks in place in order to be sure that articles are correct and lawful”, including that it took the allegations in opposition to Wootton “severely”.

Referring to the paper’s coverage of the Edwards allegations, she stated: “In-depth issues have been made across the privateness and public curiosity justifications for publishing the story.

“The matter is and stays deeply delicate and the choice was made not to title any of these concerned nor give any element which can establish them.”

Her letter continued: “At no level have we recognized the gender of the younger particular person, which the BBC has carried out on multiple event.”

It added: “The questions raised about our reporting have come particularly from the BBC itself in addition to a small group of anti-press campaigners who’ve sought to misrepresent our reporting or use selective extracts.

“The vulnerability and drug dependancy of the younger particular person can also be ceaselessly omitted.”

The letter from Dame Caroline additionally requested Newton to set out what investigations are going down into allegations made about former Sun journalist Wootton.

Final week, Wootton used his self-titled GB Information programme to model claims that he used a pseudonym and supplied colleagues cash for sexual materials “merely unfaithful” and denied “prison allegations”.

Newton’s letter in response stated the paper is investigating, including: “We take these allegations severely however we’re in no place to remark additional and certainly we make no dedication to make any additional remark relying on the result of our investigation.”

The committee of MPs has additionally written to BBC chairwoman Dame Elan Closs Stephens, saying it believes it’s “completely applicable” that the company’s fact-finding investigation into the claims in opposition to Edwards stays a “confidential course of” to respect the privateness of the people involved.

Nevertheless, it asks for BBC’s two wider critiques to be carried out in a “clear method”.

The BBC is presently endeavor two items of labor which is able to look into the company’s protocols and procedures.

The first will look at whether or not the “crimson flagging” of non-editorial complaints made to the BBC can “appropriately establish issues that require referring up throughout the organisation”.

The second assessment will assess the effectiveness of present BBC insurance policies and processes in gentle of the specifics of Edwards case.

It’s being led by group chief working officer Leigh Tavaziva and will probably be overseen by the board’s senior unbiased director, Sir Nicholas Serota.

A BBC spokesman stated: “We have now obtained the letter and will reply to the committee in the end.

“The BBC is dedicated to finishing up all work related to these issues with due diligence and due care – and we intend to full this as swiftly as potential.”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button