Here’s what the prosecution and the defence in the trial of Lucy Letby said about each of the 17 youngsters the nurse confronted prices over.
Child A, allegation of homicide. The Crown said Letby injected air intravenously into the bloodstream of the child boy. The defence said Letby did no such factor and there was suboptimal care of the teen – COUNT 1 GUILTY.
Child B, allegation of tried homicide. The Crown said Letby tried to homicide the child woman, the twin sister of Child A, by injecting air into her bloodstream. The defence said a pure occasion couldn’t be excluded resulting from her prematurity – COUNT 2 GUILTY.
Child C, allegation of homicide. Prosecutors said Letby compelled air down a feeding tube and into the abdomen of the child boy. The defence said the nurse did nothing dangerous and that medics had been sluggish to react to a variety of well being points in a really poorly child – COUNT 3 GUILTY.
Child D, allegation of homicide. The Crown said air was injected intravenously into the child woman. The defence say she could have died from an infection – COUNT 4 GUILTY.
Child E, allegation of homicide. The Crown said Letby murdered the twin child boy with an injection of air into the bloodstream and additionally intentionally prompted bleeding to the toddler. The defence said the proof didn’t present Letby attacked Child E and he too acquired suboptimal care – COUNT 5 GUILTY.
Child F, allegation of tried homicide. Letby was said by prosecutors to have poisoned the twin brother of Child E with insulin. The defence said Letby was not the poisoner and didn’t admit the proof established he was given manufactured insulin – COUNT 6 GUILTY.
Child G, three allegations of tried homicide. The Crown said Letby focused the child woman by overfeeding her with milk and pushing air down her feeding tube. The defence said the allegations had been weak and demonstrated how blame was positioned “improbably and unfairly” on the nurse – COUNT 7 GUILTY, COUNT 8 GUILTY, COUNT 9 NOT GUILTY.
Child H, two allegations of tried homicide. Prosecutors said Letby sabotaged the care of the child woman in a way which led to 2 profound oxygen desaturations. The defence said components of Child H’s care had been suboptimal and there may very well be harmless explanations for the episodes – COUNT 10 NOT GUILTY, COUNT 11 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Child I, allegation of homicide. The prosecution said Letby killed the child woman at the fourth try and had given her air and overfed her with milk. The defence said Letby did nothing to hurt Child I, who could have had an an infection and had a historical past of recurring oxygen desaturations and stomach distension – COUNT 12 GUILTY.
Child J, allegation of tried homicide. No particular type of hurt was recognized by the prosecution however they said Letby did one thing to trigger the collapse of the child woman. The defence said an infection couldn’t be dominated out as the trigger – COUNT 13 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Child Okay, allegation of tried homicide. The prosecution said Letby compromised the child woman as she intentionally dislodged a respiration tube. The defence said Child Okay was extraordinarily untimely and she had skilled suboptimal care – COUNT 14 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Child L, allegation of tried homicide. The Crown said the nurse poisoned the twin child boy with insulin. The defence said Letby was not the poisoner and didn’t admit the proof established he was given manufactured insulin – COUNT 15 GUILTY.
Child M, allegation of tried homicide. Prosecutors said Letby injected air into the bloodstream of Child L’s twin brother. The defence said Letby did nothing to hurt the boy and described the medical consultants’ proof on the “slow-acting” injection as “unbelievable” – COUNT 16 GUILTY.
Child N, three allegations of tried homicide. The Crown said Letby inflicted trauma in the child boy’s throat and additionally injected him with air in the bloodstream. The defence said Letby dedicated no dangerous acts and there was suboptimal care – COUNT 17 GUILTY, COUNT 18 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT, COUNT 19 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
Child O, allegation of homicide. Prosecutors say Letby attacked the triplet boy by injecting him with air, overfeeding him with milk and inflicting trauma to his liver with “extreme power”. The defence said Child O had some well being points earlier than Letby got here on shift and that CPR probably prompted the liver harm – COUNT 20 GUILTY.
Child P, allegation of homicide. Prosecutors said the nurse focused the triplet brother of Child O by overfeeding him with milk, injecting air and dislodging his respiration tube. The defence say Child P was subjected to a “catalogue of poor medical care” – COUNT 21 GUILTY.
Child Q, allegation of tried homicide. The Crown said Letby injected the child boy with liquid, and probably air, down his feeding tube. The defence said Letby did nothing dangerous and Child Q grew to become unwell resulting from a pure well being difficulty – COUNT 22 JURY COULD NOT REACH VERDICT.
